{"id":1619,"date":"2009-03-31T00:01:58","date_gmt":"2009-03-31T06:01:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/?p=1619"},"modified":"2009-03-31T00:02:44","modified_gmt":"2009-03-31T06:02:44","slug":"good-gestalt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/?p=1619","title":{"rendered":"Good Gestalt; Or, Perceptual Puzzling<br>Can Be Good for the Soul"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well, this past Sunday&#8212;in which <a href=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/?p=1616\"><strong>the art of Julie Fortenberry was featured<\/strong><\/a>, incidentally, so go check that out, if you missed it&#8212;I took a poll as to whether or not the creature below was a Rabbit or a Duck. As you can see, this spread below from <a href=\"http:\/\/whoisamy.wordpress.com\/\"><strong>Amy Krouse Rosenthal&#8217;s<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomlichtenheld.com\/\"><strong>Tom Lichtenheld&#8217;s<\/strong><\/a> <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Duck-Rabbit-Amy-Krouse-Rosenthal\/dp\/0811868656\"><strong>Duck! Rabbit!<\/strong><\/a><\/em> is slightly different from the spread shown on Sunday, but it&#8217;s not much more help for the undecided:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/jules\/Duck Rabbit interior1.jpg\" border=1><\/p>\n<p>To be official about it all, here were my poll results (my online poll, that is; my five-year-old walked around with the book all last week, quizzing everyone she saw):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;Um, hello. It is obviously a RABBIT. Okay, so it can also be a duck. But look closely people! As a RABBIT, it is so much cuter! Cuteness always wins. Therefore it is a RABBIT.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s both, but I agree that the rabbit is definitely cuter.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I vote for Rabbit (he told me to).&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I&#8217;m very left-to-right-oriented, so that&#8217;s a rabbit to me &#8211; rabbit ears, then head. If it were a duck, he would be facing the other way.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Duck. I can accept it as a rabbit only if I can accept that rabbits don&#8217;t have mouths.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;&#8230;it looks like a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hesperornis\" rel=\"nofollow\"><strong>Hesperornis<\/strong><\/a> without the scary teeth.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I vote rabbit.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I saw a rabbit.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;&#8230;Rabbit. 100%.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;&#8230;that duck\/rabbit is messing me up.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>So, yeah, that&#8217;s six votes for Rabbit, one lone vote for Duck (I just <em>knew<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/johnesimpson.com\/blog\/\"><strong>John<\/strong><\/a> was a non-conformist), one vote for both (with Adorability Factor edging it toward Rabbit), and one vote for Hesperornis. Only at 7-Imp. Oh, and that final vote&#8212;arguably, my favorite one&#8212;for bewilderment. <\/p>\n<p>Would my results had been the same if I&#8217;d asked with this classic ambiguous image from the world of cognitive illusions? <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/jules\/Duck-Rabbit_illusion1.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/jules\/drcover.jpg\" border=1>In Rosenthal&#8217;s and Lichtenheld&#8217;s <em>Duck! Rabbit!<\/em> (a title, released by Chronicle Books this month, which has been met with happy reviews thus far), we have, as you can see here, kidlit Gestalt Psychology 101 in action. Lichtenheld&#8217;s primary image of the Rabduck (this is my own quick and very lame appellation for it) doesn&#8217;t change much in the book, but the unnamed speakers in the book, arguing fervently for their choices (&#8220;There, see? It&#8217;s flying!&#8221;; &#8220;Flying? No, it&#8217;s hopping!&#8221;), try to sway the reader with a few small additions (it&#8217;s all about context) &#8212; such as, a fish and some water for the duck (&#8220;Look, the duck is so hot, he&#8217;s getting a drink&#8221;) and a sun for the rabbit, who&#8217;s got his ears in the water (&#8220;No, the rabbit is so hot, he&#8217;s cooling off his ears&#8221;), requiring the reader to orient the book vertically. <\/p>\n<p>An experiment in alternate perceptual possibilities for the picture book crowd? I love it. Don&#8217;t some of us&#8212;sometimes even in the span of twenty-four hours&#8212;imagine an endless number of possibilities in our own lives? Don&#8217;t our perceptual switches and the interpretations that are borne from them make our lives all the more interesting? And who know this better than children, I say. I <em>could<\/em> launch into <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rainer_Maria_Rilke\"><strong>Rilke<\/strong><\/a> and his &#8220;try to love the questions themselves as if they were locked rooms or books written in a very foreign language&#8221; advice in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Letters_to_a_Young_Poet\"><strong>Letters to a Young Poet<\/strong><\/a><\/em>, but that&#8217;d be a bit much, right? Oh, I just did. Or: Anyone else read in <a href=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/?p=1617\"><strong>my interview with D.B. Johnson yesterday<\/strong><\/a> how what turns him off is certainty? Yeah. That.   <\/p>\n<p>Rosenthal and Lichtenfeld also have fun with a brief match-up at the book&#8217;s close&#8212;brachiosaurus vs. anteater&#8212;just to leave readers with more food-for-thought. <\/p>\n<p>P.S. I&#8217;ll show you an optical illusion that messes <em>me<\/em> up: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Spinning_Dancer.gif\"><strong>The Spinning Dancer<\/strong><\/a>. Curses! CURSES UPON HER. She makes the very hemispheres in my brain hurt. Once the left side of my brain stops arguing with the right side and I finally see her going counter-clockwise, I can&#8217;t seem to move her <em>clockwise<\/em> any more. It&#8217;s like trying to leash a dragonfly to see her move the other way again. Ergh. And then I realize thirty whole minutes have passed in my life, me watching Angelina Jolie spin. <\/p>\n<p>Also: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.michaelbach.de\/ot\/\"><strong>Here<\/strong><\/a> are more optical illusions if you have even more time to spare. <\/p>\n<p>And don&#8217;t miss, speaking of perceptual madness (the good kind) <em>and<\/em> the interview with Don yesterday, the spreads from his forthcoming <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcescher.com\/\"><strong>Escher<\/strong><\/a>-esque title, <em>Palazzo Inverso<\/em>, as included in <a href=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/?p=1617\"><strong>that interview<\/strong><\/a>. Click <a href=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/jules\/PalazzoInverso1.jpg\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/blaine.org\/jules\/PalazzoInverso2.jpg\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>. Don&#8217;t you love it? <\/p>\n<p><center>* * * * * * *<\/center><\/p>\n<p><em>Illustrations from DUCK! RABBIT! by Amy Krouse Rosenthal, illustration \u00a9 2009 by Tom Lichtenheld. Published by Chronicle Books, San Francisco, CA. Posted with permission of publisher. All rights reserved.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well, this past Sunday&#8212;in which the art of Julie Fortenberry was featured, incidentally, so go check that out, if you missed it&#8212;I took a poll as to whether or not the creature below was a Rabbit or a Duck. As you can see, this spread below from Amy Krouse Rosenthal&#8217;s and Tom Lichtenheld&#8217;s Duck! Rabbit! [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-etcetera","category-picture-books"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1619\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blaine.org\/sevenimpossiblethings\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}