Time: Monday, 12:35 a.m.<\/p>\nTime: Monday, 12:35 a.m.<\/p>\n
Books Finished: 5. Read Defect<\/em> by Will Weaver this afternoon, and Grand & Humble<\/em> by Brent Hartinger this evening.<\/p>\n Pages Read: 1213<\/p>\n Time Spent Actually Reading: 15.25 hours.<\/p>\n Time Spent Blogging About It: 2 hours.<\/p>\n Unicorn Sightings<\/strong><\/a>: none.<\/p>\n Pathetic. I thought I would rock at this. I mean, seriously, sitting around reading is pretty much how I spend every weekend. Why was it so hard this time? Here’s what I think: because reading is what I usually do to procrastinate whatever I should<\/em> be doing but don’t really want to, like cleaning or packing or whatever. When reading becomes the thing I’m supposed<\/em> to be doing, my whole equilibrium is thrown. Good to know for next year.<\/p>\n But hey, I read some good books. Wanna hear about them?<\/p>\n Here’s some speedy-quick reviews of what I read. I won’t bother with summarizing the plots – just click on the links to Powell’s for that if you aren’t already familiar with ’em.<\/p>\n This is not just a sequel to Tithe<\/em><\/a><\/strong>, as I’d thought, but actually brings the characters from Tithe<\/em> and Valiant<\/em><\/a><\/strong> together for a joint sequel. It was very satisfying. I love the faery-punk world Holly Black has created, and I really appreciate the amount of care and research she’s put into developing the mythology behind these books. It’s imaginative, yet consistent. And often quite witty. I wish I’d thought to re-read Tithe<\/em> before I read this, though – turns out there’s a lot I don’t remember from 3 years ago. Thankfully, I had only read Valiant<\/em> a few weeks ago, so that part of the story was pretty fresh in my mind.<\/p>\n Bottom line: very good. Doesn’t really stand alone, though, so read the others first. If you like smart urban fantasy, you’ll love them.<\/p>\n Again, the third book in a fantasy trilogy. And again, featuring a strong female lead. Hey, a theme!<\/p>\n I really liked Magic or Madness<\/em><\/strong><\/a>, the first book of this trilogy. The second, Magic Lessons<\/em><\/strong><\/a>, was disappointing. It was so<\/em> not-a-stand-alone book it didn’t even feel like a whole book – more like the middle of a bigger book had been ripped out. So I was glad to finally get some closure with Magic’s Child<\/em>. I really love Larbalestier’s imagination, and her descriptions of the way the different characters experience their magical abilities are really cool. And I like how complex the characters are, and how she keeps you guessing about who can be trusted, and how far. Plot-wise, the trilogy gets a little shaky, particularly in the second book (there’s a lot of standing around staring at a door – more exciting than it sounds, since it’s a magic door, but still…). Magic’s Child<\/em> successfully picks up the pace again, though, and makes the trip worthwhile.<\/p>\n Bottom line: good. Really, really<\/em> doesn’t stand alone, though.<\/p>\n Um, how did I miss this in elementary school? I would have loved it! It’s got shades of Bridge to Terabithia<\/em><\/strong><\/a> in the whole imaginary-world-creation thing, plus the smart-outsider-misfit-kid theme that I generally dig. The dialogue is a little dated (“Sheesh” comes up a lot, as does “kooky”). I was surprised, though, at the whole child-predator subplot. It seems kind of before its time. But it’s good, I think – it’s not handled in too scary or graphic a way. And it’s realistic how the kids react – spooked, but generally more concerned with when they get to play outside again.<\/p>\n Bottom line: very good, although I’d be curious to see how a modern 6th grader would react to reading about 11-year-olds playing at being Egyptian priestesses.<\/p>\n Wow. This was really good. I’ve never read Will Weaver before, but I’m totally putting his other books on my TBR list. <\/p>\n I think the concept of mutant-teen is so appealing because it takes the usual teen anxieties – changing bodies, crippling self-consciousness, struggling to define one’s identity while simultaneously trying to understand where one fits in with the rest of the crowd – and amplifies them into something that’s safely surreal and ultimately more satisfying than real life. As in: it just wouldn’t be believable if the pariah-nerd-boy actually defeated the bullies and got the homecoming queen by his charm and wits alone. But if he turns out to be able to fly or walk through walls or something… well then, anything’s possible, isn’t it?<\/p>\n Anyway, Defect<\/em> adds another dimension to the genre by incorporating the question of faith: is David’s condition just a random birth defect, or is he part of a higher plan? And if he has the choice to be “normal,” should he take it? I liked that it raised these kind of questions. I also liked the complexity of the primary characters, and the tragically spot-on descriptions of the redneck teens who torment him. There’s some witty dialogue, too.<\/p>\n Bottom line: Fun, thoughtful, and imaginative. Highly recommended.<\/p>\n Whoa.<\/p>\n Did. Not. See. That. Coming.<\/p>\n Bottom line: read it. I don’t want to say any more. Just read it.<\/p>\n Thanks to MotherReader<\/strong><\/a> for hosting the 48 Hour Book Challenge. I had fun. I know I won’t win any prizes for most books or hours, but I’m hoping there’s an Honorable Mention for Most Frequent Unnecessary Updates or Weirdest Roger Sutton Dream<\/strong><\/a> or something. But whatever, reading is its own reward, right?<\/p>\n
\nSimon & Schuster\/Margaret K. McElderry Books, 2007
\n(library copy)<\/center><\/p>\n
\nPenguin\/Razorbill, 2007
\n(library copy)<\/center><\/p>\n
\nReprint ed.: Random House\/Yearling, 1986
\nOriginal ed.: Simon & Schuster\/Atheneum, 1967 (I think)
\n(library copy)<\/center><\/p>\n
\nFarrar, Straus & Giroux, 2007
\n(review copy)<\/center><\/p>\n
\nHarperCollins\/HarperTempest, 2006
\n(library copy)<\/center><\/p>\n